pop/oca-reviewer
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 3 Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

[Feedback] OCA/bank-payment#1547: thienvh332 responded to review #3

New issue
Open
opened 2026-03-16 01:46:55 -03:00 by navigator · 0 comments
navigator commented 2026-03-16 01:46:55 -03:00
Owner
Copy link

Feedback on oca-reviewer

PR: OCA/bank-payment#1547 — [16.0][IMP] account_payment_order_vendor_email: avoid forcing email_to update on email template when sending mail
From: @thienvh332
Comment: link

What they said

Hi @marcos-mendez , I appreciate the use of AI to help speed up the review process. However, I think it should mainly support human judgment rather than replace it.

In this case, the automated suggestion does not introduce any actual change (the “before” and “after” code are identical), and no failing test or traceback was provided to clarify the issue. As a result, it is difficult to act on this feedback.

Action needed

Analyze this feedback and determine if we need to:

  • Fix a false positive in the reviewer
  • Improve test detection logic
  • Update review templates / wording
  • Add this pattern to training data
  • No action needed (general comment)

Context

This comment was posted in response to an automated review by oca-reviewer.
The community member took time to respond — their feedback is valuable.

Auto-created by oca-feedback

## Feedback on oca-reviewer **PR:** [OCA/bank-payment#1547](https://github.com/OCA/bank-payment/pull/1547) — [16.0][IMP] account_payment_order_vendor_email: avoid forcing email_to update on email template when sending mail **From:** @thienvh332 **Comment:** [link](https://github.com/OCA/bank-payment/pull/1547#issuecomment-4064799020) ### What they said ``` Hi @marcos-mendez , I appreciate the use of AI to help speed up the review process. However, I think it should mainly support human judgment rather than replace it. In this case, the automated suggestion does not introduce any actual change (the “before” and “after” code are identical), and no failing test or traceback was provided to clarify the issue. As a result, it is difficult to act on this feedback. ``` ### Action needed Analyze this feedback and determine if we need to: - [ ] Fix a false positive in the reviewer - [ ] Improve test detection logic - [ ] Update review templates / wording - [ ] Add this pattern to training data - [ ] No action needed (general comment) ### Context This comment was posted in response to an automated review by oca-reviewer. The community member took time to respond — their feedback is valuable. --- _Auto-created by oca-feedback_
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag specified
Branches Tags
main
No results found.
Labels
Clear labels
No items
No labels
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
pop/oca-reviewer#3
No description provided.