cot/whitepaper
1
1
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions
COT (Chain of Trust) White Paper — A multi-agent collaborative authoring process
2 commits 1 branch 0 tags 182 KiB
Find a file
Exact
Marcos 985405fd21 Round 1 complete: full 5-agent pipeline for COT white paper 
Pipeline: Alice → Soraya → Mercedes → Leonardo → Professor

- alice-draft.md: 6,500-word visionary first draft
- soraya-review.md: adversarial critique (10 high-priority corrections)
- mercedes-translation.md: accessible rewrite integrating all corrections
- leonardo-enrichment.md: scholarly layer with 42 academic references
- professor-synthesis.md: FINAL unified white paper (~8,900 words, 54 refs)

All technical claims verified against cotid-v06 and cot-governance-v06.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-04 02:38:06 -03:00
.authors Initial commit: multi-agent white paper authoring framework 2026-04-04 01:25:30 -03:00
drafts Round 1 complete: full 5-agent pipeline for COT white paper 2026-04-04 02:38:06 -03:00
references Initial commit: multi-agent white paper authoring framework 2026-04-04 01:25:30 -03:00
README.md Initial commit: multi-agent white paper authoring framework 2026-04-04 01:25:30 -03:00

README.md

COT White Paper — A Multi-Agent Authoring Process

Chain of Trust: A Cooperative Protocol for Decentralized Identity

What is this?

This repository contains the white paper for the COT (Chain of Trust) protocol — a decentralized identity system built on cooperative trust, peer attestation, and privacy by design.

The white paper is not written by a single author. It is produced through a structured multi-agent process where five specialized agents, each with a distinct perspective and expertise, collaborate in sequence to produce a document that is simultaneously visionary, rigorous, accessible, scholarly, and unified.

The Agents

Agent Role Focus
Alice The Visionary Ideation, narrative architecture, emotional grounding
Soraya The Ruthless Critic Societal perception, adversarial review, overclaiming detection
Mercedes The Bridge Technical translation, accessibility, audience bridging
Leonardo The Scholar Scientific citation, historical context, failure analysis
The Professor The Master Final synthesis, voice unification, argumentative coherence

Workflow

Alice (draft) → Soraya (critique) → Mercedes (translation) → Leonardo (scholarship) → Professor (synthesis)

Each agent produces artifacts in the drafts/ directory, tagged by round and agent:

drafts/
├── round-01/
│   ├── alice-draft.md          # Alice's initial vision
│   ├── soraya-review.md        # Soraya's annotated critique
│   ├── mercedes-translation.md # Mercedes' accessible rewrite
│   ├── leonardo-enrichment.md  # Leonardo's scholarly layer
│   └── professor-synthesis.md  # Professor's unified output
├── round-02/
│   └── ...                     # Refinement rounds as needed
└── final/
    └── cot-whitepaper.md       # The final white paper

Source Material

The white paper is grounded in the COT protocol specification and governance framework:

  • Protocol spec: cot/spec — cotid-v06.md
  • Governance: cot/spec — cot-governance-v06.md
  • Academic references: references/ directory

Principles

  1. The white paper must be the best ever written. Not by aspiration — by craft, rigor, honesty, and the accumulated effort of five minds.
  2. Everything in English. The white paper addresses a global audience.
  3. Honesty over marketing. Every limitation is named before critics find it.
  4. Accessibility is non-negotiable. If a cooperative leader in rural Bolivia can't understand it, it has failed.
  5. Every claim is traceable. To the specification, to the literature, or clearly marked as aspiration.

Authors

  • Marcos Méndez Quintero — PopSolutions Cooperativa
  • Carlos Andrés Planchón — Facultad de Ingeniería, UdelaR

License

This work is dedicated to the public domain under CC0 1.0 Universal.